Search for a report, a publication, an expert...
Institut Montaigne features a platform of Expressions dedicated to debate and current affairs. The platform provides a space for decryption and dialogue to encourage discussion and the emergence of new voices.

Indian Federalism Under Modi, from Theory to Practice

Indian Federalism Under Modi, from Theory to Practice
 Christophe Jaffrelot
Senior Fellow - India, Democracy and Populism
 Sanskruthi Kalyankar
Postgraduate student

Indian citizens recently voted to reelect the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of the incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as results announced on May 22 reflected a majority of 303 out of the 542 seats for it. It was a big win for him, as his party won an even larger majority than in his landslide victory in 2014. However, this success in the central legislature was not reflected in the results of the elections to the state legislatures. This is illustrated by the loss of seats for the BJP in a number of states, including key ones like Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, and Madhya Pradesh. India, a union of 28 states and seven union territories, follows a federal structure of government with each state having its own legislature and government. Therefore, in order to understand why there was a disparity in BJP’s fate at the central and state levels and the implications to interact with India, it is important to examine how Indian federalism worked out in practice during Modi’s first mandate.

While the spheres of power between the states and the centre are clearly demarcated in the Indian Constitution, certain areas of policy are shared between the two. The Centre often has a prerogative over the states in decision-making in these domains. This has been a frequent issue of discord among the states. In 2014, BJP’s electoral campaign heavily focused on strengthening the framework of the Indian federalism. In their manifesto, they had outlined several key action points to this effect. However, as this note explores with keen detail, not many of these promises were kept. It is also interesting to observe how these promises were not repeated so vehemently in the election manifesto for 2019, with a meek mention of the renewed intention of the BJP to boost centre-state relationship.

In this note, To What Extent is India a Union of States? From "quasi federalism" to "national federalism", the authors Christophe Jaffrelot and Sanskhruti Kalyankar further go on to explore how other policies of the Modi government have impacted the centre-state relationship in India. It presents a report card of Modi government’s policies on federalism and how they have shaped this relationship, as well as what this means for Indian federalism. These analyses help put into perspective the difference in the election results at the state and central level, while providing an insight into how Indian federalism could evolve during Modi’s second term in office.

Policy Brief  To What Extent is India a Union of States?



Copyright : SAM PANTHAKY / AFP

Receive Institut Montaigne’s monthly newsletter in English