Green Deal Reloaded - Carbon Pricing: The Key to Economic Transformation

The European Union as a whole is much better placed than any of its individual members to implement such a polluter-pays principle. The ETS permit market should therefore be extensively reformed and applied to all sectors, as well as to importers through the border adjustment: exemptions must be eliminated, the distribution of free permits abolished, a progressively increasing floor price imposed, and "carbon income" redistributed to citizens as a mechanism for reducing related inequalities.

The 2°C target leaves Europe with a global carbon budget of only 600Gt CO2. This carbon budget limit can be expressed as a value for carbon, one that, as we know, must increase over time. The carbon value should be defined such that if all the actions that have a cost per ton of CO2 saved lower than that carbon value, the carbon budget will be balanced, and we will not cross the 2°C threshold. In principle, if this is the value that we use to set a unique carbon price, we can efficiently decentralize the allocation of climate action across our liberal economic system. The price would be just under €100 per ton of CO2 today, increasing at 4-5% per year plus inflation.

How can we redirect capital for a successful energy transition?

Public opinion tends to favor policies of prohibition and coercion when they are applied to private investments. This is true for example in the housing sector (e.g. mandatory thermal renovation, phasing out the use of gas boilers), transportation sector (phasing out combustion engines over 15 years), and electricity sector (banning investment in gas infrastructure, closing power plants). Proponents may try to justify similar policies at the household level, using paternalistic arguments about consumers’ potential inability to understand how future increases in the price of carbon will affect their budget. For manufacturers, however, that would be unthinkable. With the current CO2 price per ton over €40, natural gas already dominates coal in European electricity production. In fact Germany’s unjustifiable policy of abandoning coal by 2038 is becoming obsolete, because the markets will solve the problem on their own. Instead, what states should do is manage this socially costly transition in the mining industries, using appropriate policies to transition jobs through a supranational solidarity mechanism (the Just Transition Fund).

For the time being no one can say exactly when Europe should phase out natural gas efficiently. Legislating an artificial deadline would be significantly less efficient than leaving it to actors within the sector to manage that risk. It would be up to investors, understanding this, to act accordingly. But the contract must be clear: freedom of enterprise will be balanced against penalties on emissions by way of an increasing carbon price, with no state aid for companies that make high climate-risk investments.

Today's stimulus plans under the pandemic must remain focused on the main objective: saving businesses and jobs from the temporary shock of the lockdowns, and smoothing this shock over time through a common debt strategy. This includes saving the most polluting sectors. At the same time, the ideal would be to combine these stimulus plans with the announcement of both a unique carbon price floor and the rate of its growth over time, so that capital will be redirected toward technologies that generate less CO2. The public sector will have to face significant expenditure in order to green our public transport and our public infrastructure (schools, administrative buildings), and to support the fundamental and applied research we will need to produce the innovations essential to achieving our climate objectives. There must be a serious socio-economic evaluation of public investments in this sector, to ensure that we only implement actions that have a cost per ton of CO2 below the carbon value.

The major advantage of a massive subsidy plan for green R&D is that if the innovations it generates allow green technologies to compete with brown technologies, it will mobilize actors around the world - even in the absence of local political will to fight climate change.

There is real consensus between France and Germany on the need to steer the transition to green energy using the price signal of the ETS system and well-targeted European policies, such as R&D to overcome the current obstacles of electricity storage and e-mobility. While some may try to use climate change as a justification for destroying the free market system, comparing the relative merits of the free market with those of planned economies is little more than a rehash of a Cold War debate. Even though climate change presents an existential danger to our civilization, all that we need to address it is a single instrument: a carbon price, used intensively. This would align the myriad private interests at stake with the public good by putting a value on the thing that is most precious to us, the environment.

Copyright: TOBIAS SCHWARZ / AFP