In conclusion, this system gives us the means to better prepare for and respond to any present and future attacks. Of course, our success will necessarily be greater as a group. To that end, let's not forget that we must also join forces with our main non-European allies.
Where should member states draw the line between sovereignty and cooperation within the EU and NATO?
I’ll say it again: given the scale of the threats, it is essential that we coordinate with our European partners and allies. But in the particularly sensitive areas of sovereignty and power, and therefore independence, absolute trust is paramount. So where do we draw the line? We must act pragmatically. However, we must not forget that our partnership with NATO has a long and proven history. Within the European Union, the integrating process is continually growing - the health crisis is only the latest example - because the problems are so universal and complex, and require such huge investments that no single State could provide them alone. In the cyber domain, this is all the more necessary because the risk is very high and will only increase in the years to come. But again, in the absence of European political integration - dare I say, a form of federalism - each country must be able to, and indeed has a duty to, retain its own capacity for action.
Add new comment