Warning, this article may contain spoilers.
In less than six months between June and November 2016, the anglo-saxons experienced a double whammy. From Brexit to Donald Trump’s election, populist movements have garnered strength and momentum in a way that is extremely worrying.
Has the British vote opened the way for an American "derailment"? "If the Europeans said ‘No’ to Europe, why shouldn’t we say ‘Yes’ to a man who also rejects the conformism of traditional elites?" some Americans might think. We, too, can cross the Rubicon.
This step into a new world has inspired writers of series on both sides of the Atlantic. Two in particular, one American, the other British, catch our attention: the American show The Plot Against America and the British Years and Years. They are both six-part mini-series. One is a dystopia, or a rewriting of the past, not as it happened, but as it could have. The other one is an imaginary dive into the very near future. Their respective messages are nonetheless quite similar. In fact, each in its own way is a type of final warning that is meant to provoke fear, but really they both leave little room for hope. Fascism roams freely, populism is on the rise, but all hope is not lost. Individuals can make a difference, through their increasing awareness of danger, through their resilience and courage - provided they do not surrender in the face of difficulty and thus give in to their natural passivity.
These two series are quite similar in their themes and in their spirit. But they are not on the same footing when it comes to production and writing. The American series is of a much higher quality than the British series, at least according to the author. If you had to watch only one before the end of this summer, go for The Plot Against America.
The Plot against America
The Plot against America was first a novel published in 2004 by Philip Roth. Three years after the September 11 attack, the author of Portnoy's Complaint provocatively chose to focus, not on the Islamist threat coming from outside, but on the internal threat of right-wing temptation, which can easily turn into fascism. Roth rewrites history:
In the November 1940 presidential election, to everyone's surprise, Franklin D. Roosevelt is defeated by the hero of the first solo crossing of the Atlantic, Charles Lindbergh. The latter’s campaign was about nationalism and pacificsm, with hints of anti-Semitism. Philip Roth's talent is to have intertwined the micro with the macro, the destiny of the Levins, a Jewish family from Newark, New Jersey, with the at first unlikely and insidious, then dramatically spectacular turn of events in American politics.
David Simon, the author of cult series such as The Wire and more recently The Deuce, has chosen to adapt Philip Roth's novel, which is extremely topical at a time when Donald Trump is president. He does it with great finesse and intelligence. Some critics even judge that the quality of the series, released in 2020, is better than the novel. A rather unjust judgement in the author’s opinion: the series is simply more relevant in 2020 than the novel was in 2004. It is only the great artist’s genius to have a premonitory intuition.
Add new comment