Is it time to reset the Entente Cordiale? London certainly seems to think so.
According to The Sunday Times, the UK government is drawing up plans for a new strategic alliance with France that would go beyond existing defense and security ties. It would include further areas for cooperation, like nuclear testing, cooperation in the Indo-Pacific and the ability to land planes on each other’s aircraft carriers. But does France think the UK is being serious?
AUKUS, the elephant in the room
Timing matters. Paris is still waiting for London to explain why it joined AUKUS and what role it intends to play. The US was quick to send politicians and senior officials to Paris to repair the fallout. President Biden also apologized for the clumsiness, yet the UK has said little. France’s frustration deepened after the British Prime minister jokingly added "donnez-moi un break". It’s not that France is expecting a British apology over AUKUS - it isn’t - but any bilateral reseat will require an explanation.
Political issues around Brexit will also need to be resolved, especially the Northern Ireland Protocol and fisheries.
Time is of the essence
However, the two countries cannot afford to wait until after the French election in April to hold talks.
The absence of strong bilateral cooperation is hurting both countries. Whether it’s Africa, the Middle East, the Indo-Pacific or European security, France and the UK share much of the same worldview. Failing to work together not only hurts their interests, but it also affects their credibility in the eyes of other partners, like the United States, which expects France and the UK to work together in their neighbourhood and further afield. Complex geopolitical problems cannot afford strategic patience.
Second, AUKUS has shown France that it is more strategically alone in the world than it thought. For the UK, AUKUS was a significant win for Global Britain but it is hardly a sufficient basis to convince countries of the UK’s proclaimed new role in the world, especially if London cannot work with traditional allies like France. Investing more in NATO is positive but attempting to play NATO against the EU will do little to re-establish post-Brexit Britain’s European credentials.
Finally, the longer the UK and France wait to hold talks, the more the gap will widen. Starting talks soon would be wise given the chance that both a Johnson government and a Macron presidency will still be in place in the next five years.
Choosing the right type of agreement
The Sunday Times article suggests that the UK government is hoping for a grand treaty that would be as ambitious as the 1998 Saint-Malo Declaration (which paved the way for a European security and defense policy) or the 2010 Lancaster House Treaties (which strengthened bilateral cooperation in security, defense, nuclear and defense industry and armament).
Add new comment