Indeed, with France having clearly demonstrated its intent to side with Greece in any future conflict with Turkey, decision makers in Ankara will be even more resistant to create (and possibly deepen) Turkey’s reliance on French made platforms.
At the political level, the mutual defense agreement between Paris and Athens will be viewed from Ankara as yet another sign that France is unwilling to adopt a more balanced stance on the bilateral disputes between Turkey and Greece. As reflected in the analysis by Bruno Tertrais, the deal does not cover Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ). But in reality, it is difficult to determine that France will not take sides in a Turkey-Greece military conflict that may have originated from the dispute over EEZs. It would be naïve to assume that such an unwanted conflict would remain firmly contained and limited to the zone of contested waters. The more likely scenario is that if such a conflict emerges, it may very well spiral out of control. Therefore Paris’ view that the reassurance does not extend to EEZs is in fact of limited value to Ankara.
Secondly, the reassurance provided by France to Greece takes place in a geopolitical context where bilateral disputes between Turkey and Greece remain unsettled. From territorial waters to the continental shelf and EEZs, from the demilitarized status of the Dodecanese islands to the observed limit of Flight Information Regions, Turkey and Greece still have a cornucopia of unresolved issues. In addition, Cyprus’ ongoing political division still has the potential to generate a conflict that can draw Greece and Turkey in. On a positive note, Turkey and Greece have restarted their exploratory talks on these residual disputes. But the analysis in Ankara will be that by providing political and military support to Greece in such a geopolitical context, France has undermined the prospects of a lasting settlement between Greece and Turkey.
Add new comment